If you have been around me in the lab for the last month, you might have caught me a few times watching a soccer game while scraping away soil samples. When there is a huge bin full of samples to scrape, you need something to pass the time. As a huge soccer fan, the World Cup brings me excitement every four years when it rolls around. Some of the countries I closely followed in this World Cup have players with great individual skill but have mostly gotten their nation to advance solely on team chemistry. So far, this observation has paralleled my experience in the Agroecology lab this summer.

I am working individually most days on Elizabeth de la Reguera’s project about how saltwater intrusion affects the storage of carbon in soil on agricultural fields. In this project, different soil aggregates are separated by sieving them from large to small particle size, until eventually silt and clay is left in the end. After the aggregates are dried in an oven, I weigh them and take them back to scrape in coin envelopes (shown in the picture). The amount of carbon is then tested after the samples are in envelopes. This work is important in observing how outside forces like saltwater intrusion can greatly affect aggregate stability [1]. This research will hopefully help farmers take saltwater intrusion into account and seek solutions, such as establishing barriers to mitigate intrusion rate or adjusting crops to salt-tolerant species [2].
With the many individual projects the lab has, our “team chemistry” is still displayed. On a small scale, Elizabeth and I communicate well to ensure that her project is running smoothly. This can include relaying turkey tins to her car from the drying oven, needing more samples in the lab, or teaching me something new. In the field a couple weeks ago, I was part of a team of six when it came to installing lysimeters and soil sampling. We knocked out two fields in one day and got to go home a day early! On a large scale, the goal of our lab is to make agriculture more sustainable through research. We all know we aren’t making as much money as Messi or Ronaldo, but together we are definitely making an impact in the environmental and agricultural world. Even with the World Cup coming to an end soon, I still have a lot of great experiences left in the lab this summer.
-By Drew Mandich

References:
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. (1996). Soil Quality Indicators: Aggregate
Stability. Retrieved from
https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052820.pdf
Duan, Y. (2016). Saltwater intrusion and agriculture: a comparative study between the
            Netherlands and China. TRITA-LWR Degree Project 2016:20.

This week, the Agroecology lab was all over the news!

A piece about our research on sea-level rise and saltwater intrusion aired on NPR's Weekend Edition. Check out the piece here.

Kate also presented at the Wilson Center on Sustainable water and resilient communities. Check out the webcast and news coverage at NewSecurityBeat.

I am Jonathan Moy, an undergraduate intern in the Agroecology lab. I work with Elizabeth de la Reguera, an MS student here, in two of her projects. Her work is largely on how saltwater intrusion in Maryland affects the carbon found in soil. We recently finished transferring four thousand switchgrass plants to UMD’s greenhouse. Later in the year, the lab will be planting the switchgrass along with other salt-tolerant plants in saltwater intruded agricultural plots to determine the carbon the plants imparted in the soil. The data from that experiment will be helpful in giving farmers in Maryland a well-supported reason to use salt-tolerant crops in their crop rotations. The project I am working on right now examines the aggregate distribution in saltwater intruded agricultural fields. Soil aggregates are important to the available nutrients to the soils [1]. We are most closely looking at soil carbon—thus the title of this post. Carbonation the way most people use it usually refers to carbon dioxide reacting with a beverage to make it effervescent. While that doesn’t happen in our soils, carbon is still very interesting in soils! The method we are using uses a series of sieves to separate the soil carbon by availability [2,3]. Essentially, the smaller the aggregates are, the less available the carbon is to the plants’ roots [2]. One of the pictures with this post shows Elizabeth displaying the second smallest sieve we use in this experiment. Fun fact: the picture also features the very first sample we processed for this experiment.

During spring break, I was given the opportunity to visit the sites that we are working on! You may not be able to tell from the picture (I’m the guy in blue), but I had a blast soil sampling. If you look really closely, you can see that I’m smiling. Those soils were the same soils that we are processing right now, so that is just one more thing to be excited about when processing my samples. Before that, I spent a lot of time in the Greenhouse seeding, thinning, and transferring switchgrass until we had four thousand switchgrass plants individually growing in deep planting plugs.

- By Jonathan Moy

References:

Ontl, T.A. et al. (2013). Topographic and Soil Influences on Root Productivity of Three Bioenergy Cropping Systems. The New Phytologist, 199, 727-737. doi: 10.1111/nph.12302

Elliott, E.T. (1986). Aggregate Structure and Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus in Native and Cultivated Soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 50, 627-633. 
​
Six, J. et al. (2000). Soil Structure and Organic Matter: I. Distribution of Aggregate-Size Classes and Aggregate-Associated Carbon. Soil Science Society of America. 64, 681-689.

It is 9AM on a cold Tuesday morning in west Tennessee, and I find myself in a two-meter-deep pit in the middle of a farm field. The water in the ponded pit reaches up past the knee of my waders, and I can feel that my feet are stuck in the mud underneath. I can’t feel my fingers, but still I persevere, focusing on the task at-hand of acquiring samples from each horizon of the soil profile in front of me before I must get back out. This is just the start of a regular practice day during the week of the National Collegiate Soils Contest.

Five minutes in the pit, five minutes out. Ten minutes in, ten minutes out. Five minutes in, five minutes out. All followed by a twenty-minute free-for-all. Much like any other contest, soil judging has clearly defined rules. At the start of the contest, competitors are given scorecards and taken to soil pits. Each individual competitor has an hour at each pit to fill out their scorecard describing the morphology of the soil in the pit: its horizonation, structure, color, texture, redox concentrations, and taxonomy, just to name a few of the described features. After each competitor has judged every pit, the scorecards are graded for accuracy based on data collected by the hosting university. The individuals are ranked based on the highest combined scores.

The soils of Tennessee offered us great challenge and created much confusion with the presence of many unfamiliar features, such as the elusive glossic horizon, the cryptic lamellae, and the enigmatic plinthite; however, none of these features baffled us quite like the mysterious fragipan. Fragipans make up the dense, brittle subsurface layers hypothesized to form under conditions of compaction, deformation, and contraction (Graveel, Tyler, Jones, & McFee, 2002). As root- and water-limiting layers, calling a horizon a fragipan makes all the difference in correctly determining such important features as effective soil depth, depth to seasonally high water table, and water retention as well as soil taxonomy. Essentially, scoring well in the contest depended on correctly identifying fragipans. This may be appropriate, for the presence of and depth to a fragipan has major land use implications. Fragipans are shown to limit crop growth, with a study of soybean crops demonstrating decreases in both root growth and crop yields as depth to a fragipan decreases (Graveel, Tyler, Jones, & McFee, 2002). This issue becomes even more pressing in areas of loess deposition. The wind-blown silt blanketing the surface in such regions is highly vulnerable to erosion, especially in agricultural fields without proper erosion protection protocols, so these fields are at risk of losing yields over time due to this effective decrease in depth to fragipans.

The contest concluded with an awards ceremony under the iconic Eiffel Tower of Paris, TN. We took home fourth place overall, coming home with a lovely plaque and a much greater understanding of the soils of Tennessee.

- By Jonathan Wiechecki

References
Graveel, J. G., Tyler, D. D., Jones, J. R., & McFee, W. W. (2002). Crop yield and rooting as affected by fragipan depth in loess soils in the southeast USA. Soil and Tillage Research.
Smalley, I. J., Bentley, S. P., & Markovic, S. B. (2016). Loess and fragipans: Development of polygonal-crack-network structures in fragipan horizons in loess ground. Quaternary International.

I’ve been working with Cullen this semester, and since Cullen works on pretty much everything in the lab, I’ve had the privilege of being exposed to many different lab activities. I’ve gotten to work with Dynacrush the soil grinder, help weigh and prepare soil samples for KCl extractions, and use SamplePoint software to look at land cover and plant species diversity in field sites on the Eastern Shore. SamplePoint is a manual image analysis program that is used to classify different land cover types on individual nadir images [1]. For each photo taken of the test plots, I classified one hundred different sample pixels as bare soil, plant litter, or one of about fifteen different plant species. SamplePoint then uses the manually-entered sample data to extrapolate the land cover classifications to the rest of the image. Quantifiable land cover data, such as the percent area of a plot that is covered by one specific plant species, can be a useful metric when assessing the impact of saltwater intrusion on plant species diversity.
One of the most rewarding experiences I’ve had so far in the lab has been the hands-on soil sampling work that we did over spring break at “soils camp.” We sampled several field sites that were experiencing saltwater intrusion, and it was fascinating to personally witness the visible signs of saltwater intrusion’s effects on these agricultural fields. There are generally very clear boundaries between the brackish water ditch inhabited by phragmites reeds, the adjacent area inhabited by low-lying salt-tolerant species such as salt marsh hay, the zone of generally bare soil, and then the transition into the agricultural field.  By analyzing soil samples from these test sites, we can assess the impact that saltwater incursion has on nutrient release, carbon dynamics, nitrogen content, aggregate structure, and other soil properties [2] [3]. Soils camp was a wonderful way to spend time outdoors, get covered in mud, work together with inspiring and fun people from the lab, and understand where and how the Agroecology Lab obtains the soil samples that we process and analyze back in College Park.
- By Anna Collishaw
References

1. Crawley, A. T. 2011. Using photo interpretation and publicly available software to assess revegetation ground cover on a shaded hillside. M.S. project report. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA. 11p.
2. Helton, A. M., Bernhardt, E. S., & Fedders, A. (2014). Biogeochemical regime shifts in coastal landscapes: The contrasting effects of saltwater incursion and agricultural pollution on greenhouse gas emissions from a freshwater wetland. Biogeochemistry, 120(1-3), 133-147. doi:10.1007/s10533-014-9986-x
3. Six, J., Bossuyt, H., Degryze, S., & Denef, K. (2004). A history of research on the link between (micro)aggregates, soil biota, and soil organic matter dynamics. Soil and Tillage Research, 79(1), 7-31. doi:10.1016/j.still.2004.03.008

Hello! I work with Josh Gaimaro in Dr. Tully’s AgroEcoLab. Josh’s research focuses on the cover crop management for nutrient cycling. Cover crops are planted between rotations of cash crops. They provides various ecosystem services and improve soil quality. On the first day of my work in the lab, Josh provided me with a brief introduction to his research, in which I learned more about cover crops. It is widely accepted that the cover crops can improve the soil by retaining and later releasing nutrients. They also reduce soil compaction and prevent nitrogen leaching losses. However, different species of cover crops may differ in their function and efficacy, which requires further study [1]. Josh’s research looks into this problem and investigates the services provided by different species and mixtures of cover crops, including rye and radish. One important function of a cover crop is to remove excess nitrogen from the last cash crop and release it to subsequent crops in the spring [2]. Rye and radish have different physical traits, and will differ in their performance of this action. We believe, that their combination might work even better. This is important information for both US  agriculture and the global food system because nitrogen loss is a severe problem. Cover crops can help ameliorate this problem by increasing the efficiency of soil nutrient usage and reducing the application of synthetic fertilizer. Thus, Josh is exploring the effectiveness of different combinations of cover crops on nitrogen cycling, and I am helping him with the nitrogen uptake measurements.

My primary work in the lab are grinding soil samples and preparing the crop samples for analysis. To determine the nitrogen uptake, we need to know the amount of nitrogen in the soil as well as in the crops. Last year, Josh collected soil samples several times during the growing season. I weigh the soil after it has been air-dried and I grind the soil into even particles. For both soils and plant materials, I wrap a small amount into a piece of foil, so that we can analyze carbon and nitrogen content. The fun thing about two projects is that the crops come from “ashes” is turned into ashes in the lab; the dust from soil is also crushed into dust. So, I call my research project, “Ashes to ashes dust to dust”.
 
References:

1. Blanco-Canqui, Humberto, et al. "Cover crops and ecosystem services: Insights from studies in temperate soils." Agronomy Journal 107.6 (2015): 2449-2474.
2. Chatterjee, Amitava, and David E. Clay. "Cover crops impacts on nitrogen scavenging, nitrous oxide emissions, nitrogen fertilizer replacement, erosion, and soil health." Soil Fertility Management in Agroecosystems soilfertility (2016): 76-89.

Check out the recent article in The Atlantic focusing on our research into saltwater intrusion. This great article was researched and written by Virginia Gewin.

Last semester I visited Elizabeth de la Reguera’s study sites on the Eastern Shore of Maryland. We prepared and planted small research plots with switchgrass, barley and wheat. Elizabeth is studying the effects of saltwater intrusion on crop productivity and survival. Over winter break, I continued to work on this research by gathering data on how well the different plant species were growing in each plot. The AgroEcoLab manager, Cullen McAskill, gave me hundreds of pictures from the site, and I got to work! Cullen had placed a quadrat on the plots in the fall, so that we could determine the species of different plants within a grid. Imagine trying to count each plant individually in each plot! Instead, the quadrat is placed at each plot in random so that it isolates an area that can then be used to represent how much of that plant species is in that plot. My job was to take each picture individually with the quadrats and set a scale in which we would tell the program, SamplePoint, to count how many plants were within those quadrats. Gathering all this data will not only tell us what species is doing the best or worst in salty conditions, but it will also provide us with the information we need to improve any management techniques in the future.

-By Karla Rosales Lobos